Susan Feels Really Peeved Over Abuse

Recall when I mentioned that the Board of Directors supported the implementation of the Flock Camera, proposing a modest increase in dues of $10 per parcel.

Subsequently, when Flock terminated the contract due to owner dissent, they chose to increase dues by $18.55 per parcel and discontinued monthly Board Meetings, limiting them to just four times a year. This decision effectively minimized their engagement with the owners and members they were elected to represent.

I understand they claim it was not an act of retaliation. However, what other reason could there be for opting for an $18.55 per parcel increase after previously stating that they only required $10 per parcel to address “security” and that the budget was in excellent condition?

The video below will illustrate precisely what we were discussing. It also contains additional insights they provided. This video runs for just over 21 minutes, but I deemed it essential to include the complete statement from the Board of Directors concerning our opposition and the successful thwarting of this initiative. I even accelerated it to 2x speed, yet it still felt somewhat lengthy and replete with gaslighting.

All 2,800+/- members were not aware of the Flock system and did not give their approval for it. Only approximately 250 reside on their properties. The assertion of only 1% disapproval is disingenuous.

From 2:56 to 12:00, you may want to speed it up.

You can get a refresher on The Flock Cameras here: https://sfrpoa.com/2025/06/05/the-flock-cameras/